Bearishgeneralactive

Fed Rate Path Divergence

The Federal Reserve will need to cut rates more aggressively than markets expect in 2026-2027.

Conviction:
4/10
By:Tate Steele
Updated February 16, 2026

Rates Research

(1 entry)
Bullish0-5 Year
Confidence: 6/10|Conviction: 6/10
The Federal Reserve held its key interest rate steady in a range between 3.5% and 3.75% in January 2026, pausing its easing cycle after three consecutive cuts in 2025. The bullish case for more aggressive rate cuts than markets currently price is facing significant headwinds over a 5-year horizon. Futures markets are pricing in at most two rate reductions in 2026 and none in 2027, while the December 2025 Fed dot plot median projects only 25 basis points of cuts in 2026 and 25 basis points in 2027, with the target range falling from 3.50%-3.75% to 3.00%-3.25% by yearend 2027. However, the thesis has merit on several fronts: (1) there is notable hawkish-dovish divergence within the FOMC itself, with Governors Stephen Miran and Christopher Waller voting against the hold, with both advocating another quarter-point cut; (2) the Fed increased 2026 growth projections to 2.3%, raised from prior estimates, suggesting stronger economic momentum that could reduce the need for defensive cuts; (3) January 2026 CPI came in at 2.4% year-over-year, down 0.3 percentage points from December, with core CPI at 2.5%, the lowest level since April 2021, providing some inflation relief that could justify additional cuts; and (4) Jerome Powell's term expires May 15, 2026, and once a new Chair is in seat, the Fed may seek to cut rates one or two times, potentially signaling more dovish policy if Trump's preferred nominee is confirmed. The critical constraints are: (1) the Fed emphasized that economic activity has been expanding at a solid pace while inflation remains somewhat elevated; (2) the January statement erased a clause indicating the committee saw higher risk from a weakening labor market than from heightened inflation, suggesting a more balanced view between dual mandate objectives; and (3) the Fed's new crop of interest rate voters are made up of four neutral voters, six dovish voters and two hawkish policymakers, with high probability the new Federal Reserve will be more dovish, but policy consensus typically moves cautiously. Over a 5-year horizon, the divergence thesis is partially bullish but faces execution risk: market expectations may be constraining near-term cuts (2026-27), but longer-term (2028-2030) real rates could compress significantly if growth falters or fiscal pressures force the Fed's hand toward more accommodative policy, particularly given the structural deficit dynamics.

Key Data Points

indicator: Federal Funds Rate Target
value: 3.50% to 3.75%
source: Federal Reserve FOMC Statement, January 28, 2026
implication: Fed paused after three consecutive 25bp cuts; current level is near neutral rate estimates (3.0-3.5%)
indicator: Fed Dot Plot Median Projection (2026 Cuts)
value: 25 basis points
source: Fed December 2025 Summary of Economic Projections
implication: Markets pricing 2 cuts; Fed median projects 1 cut—clear divergence suggesting market is more dovish than Fed guidance
indicator: Fed Dot Plot Median Projection (2027 Cuts)
value: 25 basis points; Terminal Rate 3.00%-3.25%
source: Fed December 2025 SEP
implication: Very limited additional easing over next 2 years; thesis requires significant acceleration in cuts
indicator: CME FedWatch: 2026 Rate Cut Probability
value: Two 25bp cuts (at most)
source: CME FedWatch Tool & CNBC (January 2026)
implication: Markets expect limited cuts; June cut probability jumped to 83% post-CPI data (Feb 13), suggesting reopening to dovish thesis
indicator: FOMC Dissents
value: 2 out of 12 voting members (Miran, Waller) favoring cuts
source: Federal Reserve FOMC Statement, January 28, 2026
implication: Dovish minority exists but lacks consensus; Miran previously advocated for 50bp+ cuts, signaling significant internal conflict
indicator: 2026 Real GDP Growth Projection
value: 2.3% (revised up 50bp)
source: Fed December 2025 SEP
implication: Strong growth reduces urgency for rate cuts; contradicts defensive easing narrative
indicator: 2026 PCE Inflation Projection
value: 2.4% (revised down 20bp)
source: Fed December 2025 SEP
implication: Inflation still above 2% target; provides justification for Fed's cautious approach
indicator: January 2026 Headline CPI YoY
value: 2.4% (down from 2.7% in December)
source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Released February 13, 2026
implication: Disinflation trend supports eventual rate cuts; but still above Fed target, limiting near-term cut urgency
indicator: January 2026 Core CPI YoY
value: 2.5% (lowest since April 2021)
source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Released February 13, 2026
implication: Marked improvement and supports dovish thesis; CME FedWatch immediately raised June cut odds to 83%
indicator: Treasury 2Y Yield
value: ~3.46% (as of mid-January)
source: CNBC/Advisor Perspectives (January 16, 2026)
implication: Reflects near-term Fed expectations; little premium for multiple cuts suggests markets were priced conservatively
indicator: Treasury 10Y Yield
value: ~4.24% (as of January 16)
source: Advisor Perspectives (January 16, 2026)
implication: Steeper curve supports thesis that long-end is pricing less disinflation/easing than markets suspect
indicator: Fed Chair Transition Risk
value: Powell term expires May 15, 2026; Kevin Warsh selected as Trump's preferred successor
source: iShares Fed Outlook 2026; CNBC reporting
implication: Policy uncertainty and potential shift toward more dovish Chair could trigger accelerated cuts in H2 2026
indicator: Unemployment Rate
value: 4.4% (January 2026)
source: Fed FOMC Statement & Labor Department
implication: Stabilizing labor market reduces defensive cut rationale; Fed sees risks as more balanced
indicator: January 2026 NFP
value: 130,000 jobs (stronger than expected 70,000)
source: Investing.com (February 12, 2026)
implication: Labor market strength contradicts narrative of economic weakness requiring aggressive cuts
indicator: Morningstar Economist View (Preston Caldwell)
value: 5 rate cuts total across 2026-2027 vs. Fed's projection of 2 cuts
source: Morningstar Investment Management (December 2025)
implication: Professional economists more dovish than Fed; supports thesis divergence narrative
indicator: FOMC Voter Composition (New 2026)
value: 4 neutral, 6 dovish, 2 hawkish members
source: Wells Fargo/Bankrate (January 2026)
implication: More dovish skew increases odds of additional cuts by mid-year when new voting members join
indicator: Fed Balance Sheet Operations
value: Purchasing $40bn/month in T-bills & coupon bonds; running through April 2026
source: iShares Fed Outlook 2026 (December 2025)
implication: De facto accommodation via QE-lite supports dovish bias; may facilitate easier financial conditions
indicator: Institutional Rate Cut Forecast (JPMorgan)
value: One rate cut expected in 2026
source: JPMorgan Fed Meeting Analysis (January 2026)
implication: Even hawkish strategists concede to some cuts; below market expectations but not zero
indicator: Fiscal Stimulus Impact
value: $100bn+ injection from One Big Beautiful Bill Act tax cuts/refunds
source: RSM US/Bankrate (January 2026)
implication: Strong fiscal support reduces need for monetary easing and complicates inflation narrative

Sources

February 16, 2026

Credit Research

(1 entry)
Bearish0-5 Year
Confidence: 7/10|Conviction: 6/10
The thesis that the Fed will cut rates more aggressively than markets expect in 2026-2027 faces significant headwinds from a credit market perspective. Current market pricing reflects extremely modest expectations—just two 25-basis-point cuts in 2026 with none in 2027, for a terminal rate around 3%. However, credit spreads remain historically tight despite mounting idiosyncratic risks, suggesting the market is pricing in an orderly adjustment rather than aggressive easing. The bull case requires deteriorating credit fundamentals to force the Fed's hand, but current data shows solid economic growth (3.5-5.4% GDP forecasts), stabilizing labor markets (unemployment stabilization, rising small business hiring), and sticky inflation (2.4% CPI headline, 2.5% core—still above the 2% target). Critically, Powell explicitly stated it's "hard to look at the data and say that policy is significantly restrictive," positioning the Fed to defend the current 3.5-3.75% rate. The incoming Warsh administration (assuming confirmation) is expected to be modestly dovish but highly independent, not a rate-cutting zealot. Credit conditions don't signal economic distress: IG OAS at ~80-100 bps (historically tight), HY OAS at 2.84-2.92% (mid-range, not distressed), and only modest default activity. For aggressive cuts to materialize, credit markets would need to price in a material economic deterioration—labor market weakness, inflation acceleration, or financial stress—none of which are evident in current data. The most likely scenario is 1-2 modest cuts late in 2026 (June onward), not aggressive cutting. This thesis is **bearish for aggressive easing** but could prove correct if labor data deteriorates sharply or if credit stress emerges unexpectedly.

Key Data Points

indicator: Fed Funds Rate Market Pricing (2026-2027)
value: 2 cuts in 2026 (50 bps), 0 cuts in 2027; terminal rate ~3%
source: CNBC Fed Survey, CME FedWatch, LPL Research
implication: Markets are pricing minimal easing, not aggressive cuts. The thesis requires a significant repricing of rate cut expectations.
indicator: January 2026 CPI (YoY Headline)
value: 2.4%, down from 2.7% in Dec; Core CPI 2.5%
source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (Feb 13, 2026)
implication: Disinflation is occurring but inflation remains above Fed's 2% target, limiting rationale for aggressive cuts. Tariff pass-through peaked; Goldman forecasts core PCE ~2% by mid-2026.
indicator: Economic Growth Forecasts
value: Q3 2025 GDP at 4.4%, Q4 tracking 5.4%; 2026 GDP forecast 2.3-2.4%
source: Atlanta Fed, Goldman Sachs, CNBC Survey
implication: Solid growth supports Fed's "wait and see" stance. Above-trend growth reduces justification for aggressive easing.
indicator: Labor Market Status
value: Unemployment 4.4%, hiring weak (40K/mo) but stabilizing; small business hiring uptick
source: Fed Jan 2026 statement, JPMorgan, Powell press conference
implication: Fed removed language about labor market risks being higher than inflation risks. Stabilization, not deterioration, supports pause.
indicator: IG Corporate OAS
value: ~100 bps (as of Feb 2026); 5-year average 106 bps
source: ICE BofA Index, FRED, CME
implication: Tight spreads indicate low credit stress. IG is historically compressed. No distress signal to force Fed action.
indicator: HY Corporate OAS
value: 2.84-2.92% (as of Feb 12, 2026); 5-year average 3.5%
source: ICE BofA Index, Trading Economics, YCharts
implication: HY OAS mid-range, not tight. Vulnerable to widening if growth falters, but not signaling distress today.
indicator: Fed Chair Transition
value: Powell term ends May 15, 2026; Warsh expected successor (per CNBC survey 50% probability)
source: CNBC Fed Survey, iShares, J.P. Morgan
implication: Warsh (2006-2011 Fed governor) favors 'higher for longer' philosophy, not aggressive cutting. Markets don't expect him to override independence.
indicator: FOMC Dot Plot Dispersion (Dec 2025)
value: 4 participants see 0 cuts, 4 see 25bps, 4 see 50bps in 2026; median 25bps
source: Federal Reserve, BondSavvy
implication: Deep split within committee. 7 of 19 see no cuts; 8 see 2+ cuts. Only narrow dovish majority supports easing.
indicator: Powell's Rate Restrictiveness Assessment
value: "Hard to look at the data and say that policy is significantly restrictive"
source: Powell Jan 28, 2026 press conference
implication: Fed sees current 3.5-3.75% rate as appropriate, not tight. Major headwind for thesis.
indicator: Default Risk / Credit Quality
value: First half 2025 saw record 'mega' bankruptcies; refinancing wall in 2026-2027; zombie companies rising
source: LPL Research, Cornerstone Research
implication: Credit stress building in small-cap leveraged space, but not yet systemic. Could force cuts if spreads widen materially.
indicator: Rate Cut Probability by Meeting (Feb 2026)
value: March cut: ~37% probability; April (Powell's last): ~47% probability; June cut: low single digits in March
source: CME FedWatch, Deutsche Bank, Fortune (Feb 11, 2026)
implication: Markets see small chance Powell cuts before leaving (April); more likely first cut in June with new chair, but still modest.
indicator: 10-Year Treasury Yield Range (2026 Forecast)
value: 3.75%-4.25% (LPL expects); 4.14% current (Feb)
source: LPL Research, Fed data
implication: Long rates expected to remain elevated despite 2 cuts. Reflects modest easing priced in, not aggressive cuts.

Sources

February 16, 2026

Equity Research

(1 entry)
Bearish0-5 Year
Confidence: 8/10|Conviction: 7/10
The Fed Rate Path Divergence thesis—that the Fed will cut rates more aggressively than markets currently expect—faces substantial headwinds and should be viewed with significant skepticism over a 5-year horizon. Current market pricing of only 50 basis points of cuts in 2026 (two 25bp reductions) and zero cuts in 2027 appears largely aligned with Fed guidance and economic fundamentals, not dovish. Futures markets are pricing in at most two rate reductions in 2026 and none in 2027, regardless of the next Fed chair. The thesis would require either a significant economic deterioration forcing defensive cuts, or a dramatic inflation collapse enabling aggressive easing—neither appears probable given current data. Across the 5-year period, the Fed is more likely to hold rates near neutral (around 3% by end-2026, per consensus) and potentially move higher if growth accelerates and inflation remains sticky. Still-sticky inflation, in Vanguard's projections remaining above 2%, suggests that in 2026 the Federal Reserve will have limited scope to cut rates below the estimated neutral rate of 3.5%. The thesis is bullish for equities, but the key driver of equity returns through 2026-2030 will be earnings growth (estimated at 12-14% in 2026) and productivity gains from AI, not multiple expansion from lower rates. A dramatic rate-cut scenario would actually signal economic stress rather than opportunity, making this a contrarian bet that requires more dovish Fed leadership under Kevin Warsh—but even Warsh's expected tenure is unlikely to deliver the aggressive cuts Trump demands.

Key Data Points

indicator: Fed Funds Rate Current Level
value: 3.50%-3.75% (held steady at January 28, 2026 meeting)
source: Federal Reserve, January 28, 2026 FOMC Statement
implication: Fed has paused easing after three 25bp cuts in late 2025. Powell characterized current level as 'loosely neutral,' indicating Fed sees limited room for cuts without supporting growth beyond potential.
indicator: Market Pricing: 2026 Rate Cut Expectations
value: 50bp total (two 25bp cuts); zero cuts priced for 2027
source: CME FedWatch Tool & CNBC Fed Survey (January 2026)
implication: Market pricing is restrained and conservative, not ahead of Fed thinking. Jan CPI beat (2.4% vs 2.5% expected) briefly boosted June cut odds to 83%, but core inflation at 2.5% and solid growth outlook limit aggressive easing.
indicator: Fed Dot Plot Projections (December 2025)
value: Median projection: 3.4% by end 2026; 3.1% by end 2027
source: Federal Reserve December 2025 Summary of Economic Projections
implication: Fed's own central tendancy projects minimal cuts—roughly 100bp across 2026-2027 combined. This aligns with market pricing, not dovish expectations. Fed Governors Miran & Waller dissented for cuts, but Miran is outlier with extremely dovish views.
indicator: Inflation: January 2026 CPI Data
value: Headline 2.4% YoY (down from 2.7% in December); Core 2.5% YoY (lowest since April 2021)
source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Released February 13, 2026
implication: Inflation showing welcome disinflation trend but remains above 2% target. Recent three-month trend shows inflation averaged 0.2% per month in November, December, and January, equivalent to roughly 2.9% annual rate, with core prices also averaging 2.9% monthly, suggesting inflation continues to exceed the Fed's two-percent target. Government shutdown data distortions mean true rate may be ~2.7% per Moody's estimate.
indicator: Fed Neutral Rate Estimate
value: 3.0%-3.5% range (most estimates cluster around 3.0-3.25%)
source: Vanguard, BlackRock, JPMorgan, Federal Reserve Speeches
implication: Most estimates of the neutral rate are around 3%. Current 3.5-3.75% policy rate is within this range, leaving only 50-75bp of cumulative easing room before approaching true neutral. Thesis requires Fed to cut below neutral to provide stimulus.
indicator: Economic Growth Outlook 2026
value: Consensus 2.2-2.4% real GDP growth; some forecasts higher at 2.7%
source: Goldman Sachs, Vanguard, RBC, CNBC Survey (Jan 2026)
implication: The U.S. economy expanded at a solid pace last year and is coming into 2026 on a firm footing. Strong growth is not consistent with emergency rate cuts. AI capex and productivity are supporting demand.
indicator: Labor Market Status
value: Job gains 50k/month (recent); unemployment ~4.2%; showing stabilization signals
source: Federal Reserve January 2026 Statement; Vanguard, JPMorgan Analysis
implication: Labor market cooling is gradual, not collapsing. Labor markets have cooled sharply, with job creation slowing from over 200,000 positions per month at the end of 2024 to around 50,000 currently, but demographic and immigration trends account for 70% of the slowdown, with underlying conditions remaining resilient, and unemployment expected to settle around 4.2% by end 2026. No crisis signal triggering defensive cuts.
indicator: S&P 500 Earnings Growth Consensus 2026
value: 12.3%-14.6% EPS growth expected; forward P/E ratio 21.5x (vs 10-yr avg 18.8x)
source: FactSet, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley (Q1 2026 data)
implication: For CY 2026, analysts are projecting earnings growth of 14.4% and revenue growth of 7.5%. Equity upside is earnings-driven, not multiple-driven by lower rates. If thesis proves correct (rates cut aggressively), it signals earnings disappointment—a negative for equities.
indicator: 10-Year Treasury Yield
value: 4.05%-4.16% (as of mid-February 2026)
source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve H.15 Data
implication: After CPI beat, 10-yr fell from 4.24% to 4.05%. Markets expect the Fed to lower the fed funds rate to around 3%, likely keeping the 10-year Treasury yield between 3.75% and 4.25%, with inflation remaining above target and limiting aggressive cuts. Current yields price in modest cuts, not aggressive easing.
indicator: Fed Chair Leadership Transition
value: Jerome Powell's term ends May 2026; Kevin Warsh expected nominee
source: Federal Reserve, White House (January 2026)
implication: Forecasters feel more optimistic that the next Fed chair will run policy independently of the White House, even while he's seen as more dovish than Fed Chair Powell. Warsh is dovish relative to Powell but Wall Street and economic forecasters do not believe that the next Fed chair will drive down overnight rates toward the low levels demanded by the president.
indicator: Market Consensus Rate Path End-2026
value: ~50bp cumulative cuts in 2026; rates settling near 3.0%
source: CNBC Fed Survey, CME FedWatch, Goldman Sachs (Jan 2026)
implication: Consensus reflects a data-dependent, gradual normalization toward neutral, not aggressive easing. The survey shows the average outlook is for two more quarter-point cuts this year, or 50 basis points, with no reductions expected yet for 2027. The funds rate is seen settling around 3% this year and staying there through 2027.
indicator: Tariff Impact on Inflation & Growth
value: Mixed: tariff effects peaked in early 2026; expected to fade by mid-year
source: St. Louis Fed President Musalem, Fed Officials (Jan-Feb 2026)
implication: Inflation is expected to resume a path toward 2% as tariff effects ebb later in the year, with tariff effects on prices temporary and expected to wane in coming months. Reduces urgency for defensive cuts if near-term stagflation fears ease.
indicator: Fed Balance Sheet: Reserve Management Purchases (RMP)
value: $40bn/month in T-bills (December 2025 onward), expected to continue through April 2026
source: Federal Reserve Board, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
implication: The Fed approved new purchases of Treasury bills and coupon bonds out to three years at the pace of up to $40 billion per month for reserve management, not quantitative easing, with this pace expected to be used until April 2026. RMPs provide liquidity without signaling QE; support for financial system, not economic stimulus.

Sources

February 16, 2026